Free Essays on Walt Whitmans Style

Walt Whitman was a follower of the two Transcendentalist Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau. He believed in Emerson and Thoreau’s Transcendentalist beliefs. Whitman believed that individualism stems from listening to one’s inner voice and that one’s life is guided by one’s intuition. Whitman lent himself to this concept of independence. He once said, â€Å"Everything on earth has the divine spark within and thus is all part of a whole.† This philosophy of individualism led to an optimistic emphasis on society. Because Whitman immodestly praised the human body and glorified the senses, â€Å"Walt Whitman’s poems assert the worth of the individual and the oneness of all humanity.† Whitman’s first poem in Leaves of Grass is called â€Å"Song of Myself†. In â€Å"Song of Myself† Whitman tells us that the absolute unity of matter and spirit, and all, which that unity involves, is the dominant conception of this first and most characteristic period. Whitman said, â€Å"The true poet is not the follower of beauty, but the august of beauty.† Whitman’s â€Å"Song of Myself† was capable of making whoever withes to be so, wiser, happier, better; and it does these not by acting on the intellect, by telling us what is best for us, what we ought to do and avoid doing, but by acting directly on the moral nature itself, and elevating and purifying that. This also shows how he really believed in Transcendentalism, which stated strong intense individualism and self-reliance. He used the same theme in all of his poems throughout the book. Its almost seems as if he wrote the book just for one reason. That reason being how important every individual in the world is. In conclusion, I conclude that Whitman’s poems really do express his transcendental beliefs. I believe he really did try to assert the worth of the individual in all his poems. He used great similes and metaphors to pinpoint his beliefs. Also, his freque... Free Essays on Walt Whitmans Style Free Essays on Walt Whitmans Style Walt Whitman was a follower of the two Transcendentalist Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau. He believed in Emerson and Thoreau’s Transcendentalist beliefs. Whitman believed that individualism stems from listening to one’s inner voice and that one’s life is guided by one’s intuition. Whitman lent himself to this concept of independence. He once said, â€Å"Everything on earth has the divine spark within and thus is all part of a whole.† This philosophy of individualism led to an optimistic emphasis on society. Because Whitman immodestly praised the human body and glorified the senses, â€Å"Walt Whitman’s poems assert the worth of the individual and the oneness of all humanity.† Whitman’s first poem in Leaves of Grass is called â€Å"Song of Myself†. In â€Å"Song of Myself† Whitman tells us that the absolute unity of matter and spirit, and all, which that unity involves, is the dominant conception of this first and most characteristic period. Whitman said, â€Å"The true poet is not the follower of beauty, but the august of beauty.† Whitman’s â€Å"Song of Myself† was capable of making whoever withes to be so, wiser, happier, better; and it does these not by acting on the intellect, by telling us what is best for us, what we ought to do and avoid doing, but by acting directly on the moral nature itself, and elevating and purifying that. This also shows how he really believed in Transcendentalism, which stated strong intense individualism and self-reliance. He used the same theme in all of his poems throughout the book. Its almost seems as if he wrote the book just for one reason. That reason being how important every individual in the world is. In conclusion, I conclude that Whitman’s poems really do express his transcendental beliefs. I believe he really did try to assert the worth of the individual in all his poems. He used great similes and metaphors to pinpoint his beliefs. Also, his freque...

Polygamy vs. Monogamy essays

Polygamy vs. Monogamy essays Monogamy and polygamy are the two distinguishing types of marital structures that exist in modern society, each having differentiating circumstances encompassing their views. Monogamy, universally accepted in the American culture, can be defined as when a single female and male come together, marry, and mate. Polygamy, more formerly accepted in the Arabic and African cultures, is defined as when one single male marries and mates with several single females. The rules of marriage are fairly well drawn out for monogamy, but polygamy is faced with the contrary due its complex nature. Religion plays a vital role in the determination of whether it is religious acceptable for a culture to partake in polygamy as well. Polygamous marriages definitely face more problematic marriages than monogamous. A study of the Palestinian Bedouin-Arab community in the Negev region in Israel was conducted by Salman Elbedour, Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, and Mohammad Alatamin. In their attempts to find behavioral problems arising from polygamous and monogamous families, they were able to come to the conclusion that polygamous families face more interfamily conflict than that of monogamous families. Uneven treatment of wives by the husband (Hassouneh-Phillips, 2001, as cited in Elbedour, Onwuegbuzie, Alatamin, 2003). This is a problem that has naturally arisen from the polygamous marriage system. The husband can simply not evenly distribute their time to all of his wives. Naturally, this could occur by choice too. A husband can choose to neglect one of his wives and her children, thus creating more problems. The child may feel isolated and too distant from his father due to this conflict between husband and wif e. In a practical monogamous marriage, the husband and wife will attempt to come to an agreement that would be positively suitable for the child. Due to the large nature of a polygamous marriage, the final agreements made by the h...

Legal Theory Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Legal Theory - Essay Example This discussion chronicles the rationale for the implementation of Britain's seatbelt and crash helmet legislation, the laws' actual effects in contrast to what was intended as well as the theories as to why they are essentially ineffective. There has been no legislation that has put legal restrictions on individuals whose actions hurt no one other than themselves which many, including myself, consider wrong. This opinion extends to other issues such as drug possession, prostitution, bigamy, etc. In other countries, laws preventing gambling and gay marriage fall into this category as well. There is, of course, a line drawn within this opinion regarding laws that include children. Consensual adults, however, should be free to choose how to live their lives as they please if it does not interfere with the personal welfare or property of others. But the issue of seatbelts and wearing of helmet should be taken seriously and for this case an act of made on the same. This is because the state has full responsibility to safeguard against the life of people and if this becomes law, hence they protect the life its people. Individuals themselves ought to aware that it is morally upright for them to use seatbelt and helmets, not b ecause is a law or not but because there are benefits associated with this act. Even though one has a right to reason and make a free decision of his/her own choice, one should make a concrete decision that benefit him. Wearing seat belts and/or helmets are reported to save lives but this in itself is of much controversy as will be discussed further. Seatbelt and crash helmet laws, though enacted with the intention of saving lives, are a controversial issue based on the ideology of individual liberty. Some would argue that along with the privilege to operate a vehicle, a responsibility to obey all rules set forth by lawmakers necessarily follows and that helmet and seat belt laws are not considered victimless. This discussion chronicles the rationale for the implementation of Britain's seatbelt and crash helmet legislation, the laws' actual effects in contrast to what was intended as well as the theories as to why they are essentially ineffective. Seatbelt legislation has had an unintended impact for those persons not riding in automobiles such as motorcyclists, bicyclists and pedestrians. For example, Britain's seatbelt laws coincided with an average increase of 135 pedestrian and 40 cyclist deaths per year. A study for the UK Department of Transport commissioned in 1981, the 'Isles Report,' examined the consequences of seatbelt laws in eight European countries.1 This study used two countries, Italy and the UK, both of which did not have seatbelt laws at that time, as control models. The study discovered that the most significant effect of these laws was a marked increase in deaths by those outside the car, a finding that was unanticipated. The study predicted that if the UK were to enact compulsory seat belt legislation, deaths incurred by those